Both business and politics struggling to adapt to changed reputations

Post
12 February 2014
Posted by Alastair Campbell
1

Overcoming my slight fear of heights, I took the lift to the top of The Gherkin today to take part in the launch of Portland's new document on trust and reputation, Bringing Business Home. Whether me from a left-leaning perspective, City AM editor Allister Heath from the right, FT journalist Elizabeth Rigby or COMRES pollster Katherine Peacock probably from somewhere in between, all of us felt there was a real problem and that business was not doing a great job at dealing with it. Partly this is because business, and perhaps especially the banks which have become something of a symbol, have not adapted well either to the consequences of the crash, or the changed expectations that the public have of both private and public sector. As a result, business is currently giving off a sense of both being arrogant and beleaguered at the same time, which is not a healthy place to be. However, it may be they have taken the lead from government. On a similar theme, I spoke at another event last night attended mainly by business people and bankers, sharing the platform with an economist and someone who was introduced as a 'futurologist,' Paul Stevenson. The idea was that I gave a political perspective, the economist gave an economic worldview and Paul set out a few trends. He made the point that whilst political and business communities inevitably focused a lot on politics and economics - both widely seen as bust - they barely focused on what he called geo-technology. He said that under 35s understood this shift and it was one of the reasons they were disengaging from politics. I couldn't guess at his own politics, though he had a couple of cracks at Tony Blair over Iraq, and in our exchanges on twitter this morning made clear that he is not a Labour supporter. But he left nobody in any doubt that he felt Michael Gove was - I quote - a compete idiot. He had a rather neat line to encapsulate something I have been feeling especially since that bizarre speech Gove made last week, namely that he was 'preparing the country for the last generation rather than next one.' If I had to guess the political make up of the dinner, I would reckon to a Tory dominance, though one or two whispered to me they were Labour, and a bank fund manager told me he was backing UKIP. Normally at such events really aggressive attacks on Tory ministers will get a little head-shaking and tut-tutting but the attack on Gove led to more nods than tuts. Equally when the economist said that the modest UK recovery had next to nothing to do with George Osborne's austerity strategy - he said 83 per cent of the cuts were yet to work their way through the system - I sensed little resistance. Inevitably a lot of people were talking about the floods, and it has become a given that the government has handled this badly, and that the playing of the blame game by ministers has been unedifying. As I told the Portland event this morning, Cameron was right to call for an end to the blame game, though that hasn't stopped the sniping at Environment Agency chair Chris Smith. Sometimes it takes an unexpected event to cement in the public mind a thought or impression that has been brewing for some time. I wonder if the arrogance and incompetence shown in their handling of the floods might have played into a broader feeling that they are, well, arrogant and not very competent. Anyway, I came away thinking the government is entering a very vulnerable phase and that if Labour can match hard attack with a setting out of its own agenda, the public is ready to hear and heed very hard attack indeed. Given the importance of education to any country's future economic strength, Michael Gove is uniquely vulnerable. Paul Stevenson's line is absolutely right. We are going through a new industrial revolution. And we have an education secretary calling for children to be given lines and run round football fields as a punishment. Mindblowing. Both business and politics have a trust problem. Business has to show that it understands the importance of customer service, and that includes having values and understanding that they have a broader social purpose beyond the pursuit of profits alone. And politics has to show that it understands the extent to which the world has changed and with it people's expectations of what business and politics can and should do. The answer is always rooted in strategy. But anyone who watched David Cameron's press conference yesterday could see that he remains bereft of strategy. It is about casting around trying to look busy and concerned, albeit too late with regard to the floods. So mishandled have the floods been that now he has to cancel a trip to the Middle East. It is all a but day to day, hand to mouth, and not what leadership is really about. A country without strong political and economic leadership is going to struggle more than most.

5 minute(s) read

One response to “Both business and politics struggling to adapt to changed reputations”

reaguns says:

23 February 2014 at 3:10 pm

‘Mark’ Stevenson – though if I know Alastair this will be a deliberate burn. Just a note Alastair, the usual names we use for this trick are “Bob” and “George” but probably Paul was better for hiding your tracks lol

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Alastair Campbell’s diary: I went head-to-head with Aleksandar Vučić – and we’re still at war

The Serbian president still blames Nato and New Labour over Kosovo... Continue

29 April 2026

Article

Posted by Alastair Campbell

Alastair Campbell’s diary: I went head-to-head with Aleksandar Vučić – and we still don’t agree

The Serbian president still blames Nato and New Labour over Kosovo... Continue

29 April 2026

Article

Posted by Alastair Campbell

526. Can the King Save the Special Relationship?

Is the so-called ‘special relationship’ between America and Britain already broken, and is it even worth saving? How can the UK and Europe achieve independence from the US on defence, tech and nuc... Continue

28 April 2026

Podcast

Posted by Alastair Campbell

186. President Aleksandar Vučić: Russia, China, and How Serbia Could Join the EU

How does President Vučić justify Serbia's geopolitical balancing act between Russia, China, and the European Union? Why does he warn that if the EU further delays enlargement, the United States migh... Continue

27 April 2026

Podcast

Posted by Alastair Campbell

525. JD Vance vs. the Pope and the Far-Right Funding Machine (Question Time)

Why do Trump and JD Vance keep arguing with the Pope about theology? Who is funding the British and European far-right? As nationalism grows in Scotland and Wales, did devolution make this inevitable?... Continue

23 April 2026

Podcast

Posted by Alastair Campbell

524. Starmer’s Mandelson Mess and the Iranian Nuclear Threat

Did Starmer show a fatal lack of judgement and curiosity about Peter Mandelson’s suitability for public office? How and why did Trump destroy years of successful Iranian nuclear ‘containment’ po... Continue

21 April 2026

Podcast

Posted by Alastair Campbell

Alastair Campbell’s diary: The bizarre truth about my own vetting for No 10

Hours after being grilled by an ex-military man, I ran into him again - in very strange circumstances... Continue

21 April 2026

Article

Posted by Alastair Campbell

185. Can Labour Win Back Scotland? (Anas Sarwar)

Does the Leader of Scottish Labour regret calling for Keir Starmer to resign over his appointment of Peter Mandelson as US Ambassador? In the upcoming election, would he consider putting Scottish Labo... Continue

20 April 2026

Podcast

Posted by Alastair Campbell