Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
4 May 2011
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
576. How Xi is Outplaying Trump and Tensions in Northern Ireland
As Trump becomes the first American president to personally welcome a visiting head of state off a plane since JFK greeted Harold Macmillan in 1962, did his summit with President Xi signal improving U... Continue1 October 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
575. Alastair Reacts to Burnham’s Speech and Rory’s Viral Stare
Will scrapping the triple lock be electorally perilous for Burnham, or can his vision of a national care service convince the public and his party that it’s time for pension reform? Did being Mayor ... Continue29 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Why is Farage so keen to protect Russia’s right to lie and cheat?
Reform's leader is protesting too much as he wails about free speech in the face of Putin’s disinformation... Continue29 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
208. Mustafa Suleyman: Is AI Actually Conscious?
Can Artificial Intelligence stay subordinate? Is Anthropic’s 100-Page constitution creating dangerous AI autonomy? Should AI models be granted legal personhood, rights, or financial compensation? C... Continue28 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Why Nuclear War Is More Likely Than You Think (with Carlo Rovelli)
Why have we stopped talking about the risk of nuclear war when the risk is greater than ever? What is a ‘nuclear winter’ and why are nuclear exchanges such extreme risks for the future of humanity... Continue24 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
574. Germany’s Political Disaster and Can the Lib Dems Fight Back?
As the far-right Alternative for Germany wins another regional election, wiping out the ruling Christian Democratic Union in former Chancellor Angela Merkel's own backyard, will Friedrich Merz face th... Continue24 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: I met a hero of Gaza in a cinema queue
A new documentary lets Victoria Rose and other doctors describe the horrors they have witnessed... Continue23 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
573. Burnham and Carney vs. Trump, and the Diana Dispute
As Burnham meets Trump face-to-face for the first time at the UN General Assembly, will he adopt Mark Carney’s or Keir Starmer’s approach to dealing with the US President? With Carney receiving a ... Continue23 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
The only surprising feature is that yet again the conspiracy theorists are given all the ammunition they need to raise their game. With such a momentous event forthcoming the Obama administration had months to pre-plan their news management in the aftermath. Yet we have statements that OBL was armed and used a woman as a human shield, now contradicted by the White House themselves.
It would be interesting to hear from AC as to why so little time/thought is devoted to the pre-planning of the aftermath of such events, when the fan has been struck.
I’m no conspiracy theorist, but the official story of what happened in Pakistan is just plain weird, especially the burial at sea.
I think this is what most people find difficult to swallow – even more so in the context of the parading and public execution Saddam (arguably a less significant find) was given.
From what I have been reading online, the conspiracy theories are saying that he was *already* dead (most say in 2002)… not that he isn’t dead.
“Secret memos expose link between oil firms and invasion of Iraq.”
No, this is not from a conspiracy theory website. It is from the Independent. And the memos are government memos.
Tony Blair called the “oil conspiracy theory” absurd. Public denials were issued at the time. But now government memos show that plans to exploit Iraq´s oil reserves were discussed by government ministers and world´s largest oil companies year before Britain took a leading role in invading Iraq.
No wonder there are conspiracy theories around!
And surely the papers should have known better than to print the “official line” from the White House about Osama bin Laden immediately without a question.
And Martti Koskenniemi, a Finnish professor of international law, stated on our TV that the US acted against the rules. Justice and revenge are two different things.
As Jackie Ashley wrote in the Guardian, international law is all we have. If we throw it away, we have nothing left.
Targeting Gaddafi is against international law.
President Ronald Reagan´s Executive Order 12333 says that “no person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in assassination”.
Jimmy Carter´s EO 12036 bans indirect US involvement in assassinations. EO 11905 by Gerald Ford bans political assassinations.
The US has been involved I guess in over 50 military actions after WW2. Before Libya, only Korean War (1950-53) and 1991 Persian Gulf War had the UN backing.
The US did terrible things to civilians at Laos and Vietnam. Its involvement in Vietnam was based on a lie what happened at Tonkin Gulf.
The US government via CIA has been involved in numerous regime changes, many involving democratically elected governments.
Iran 1953. Guatemala 1954. Congo 1960. Chile 1973. Nicaragua. El Salvador. Etc.
The US cannot claim a monopoly on the moral high ground.
And after Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib we cannot trust the US.
George Orwell wrote in a 1946 essay that political language has to consist largely of euphenism and sheer cloudy vagueness. As long as there will not be straight talk from governments, there will be conspiracy theories around.
And for a very good reason.
Jim Hacker´s first rule of politics was: Never believe anything until it is officially denied!
Ps. Personally I do believe only in one specific conspiracy theory. There clearly was a second shooter on the grassy knoll. And yes, I have seen a photo of it unearthed from the US by a reliable Finnish journalist. It was shown on our national TV.
Spot on, as usual. Any chance you could show the return key a little love though? That’s one hell of a block of text to digest in one go 🙂
Would having him alive and tracked not be of greater benefit to our global security, as some reports suggest he was still authorising global attacks. surely the knowledge this provided could have saved countless lives. Or was this simply a tactic to raise Mr Obama’s ratings after a torrid few weeks.
Obama couldn’t have lied the consequences would be too much for any nation to handle. Yet knowing his whereabouts for so long, I think this death is more for a political reason rather than world wide security
The conspiracy theorists will, as you say, believe anything that they want but I’d be happy to bet any of them that we won’t be seeing a still living and breathing Bin Laden popping up on Al Jazeera any time soon. The conspiracists will, presumably, just argue that he’s being held somewhere or other for the rest of eternity. Cognitive dissonance is a wonderful thing.
yew fag
It would help if they released the actual events as they happened, rather then changing the story several times, as if to try and justify it. I suppose it wouldn’t stop the conspiricy theories, but at least the US Gov’t would have had more credibility in what is seen by the majority of people as a pretty well executed mission.
Will we get to see the footage? A Hollywood version is more likely starring Charlie Sheen.
So do you think the OBL op is the reason the Royals changed their plans and didn’t have a honeymoon?
The conspiracy theorists must be completely mad.
Do they believe for a second that Obama would risk gifting OBL with the PR coup of the century…. by simply making it known that he’s still alive??
I think chumps may be offended by your comparison…
he is more chumpy a chump-chump than the biggest chumpiest chump chump that ever chumped a chump in chumpland.
And I just loved that Obama probably didn’t even know until afterwards that his live TV announcement cut off 15 minutes of Chumpy Chump-chump’s, new Chump of the year show.
And we don’t need photos to know Obama is a USURPER, but we got some anyways, have a look!
The video that will END the Obama Presidency! Birthers Get Last Laugh & Demand Formal Apology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1DHZmeMXyE
Conservative Central Office must be livid – complete waste of a Royal Wedding to distract the media from the government’s plans ahead of the local elections.
With hindsight they could have had the wedding next May instead unless……
AC I don’t think there will be many people claiming that Osama Bin Laden is still alive. Quite the opposite in fact. OBL has been announced dead before.
In 2002 in Pakistan by President Musharraf.
In 2003 the Head of the FBI said he was dead.
In 2005 a US Senator said he was dead.
In 2007 Benazir Bhutto said in an interview with David Frost that he had
been killed and even named the assassin.
There can surely be no doubt that OBL is dead. As for when, where and how?
That’s another question. It all depends on evidence and who is to be believed.
I’m not sure whether you’re advertising a particularly toxic brand of cigarette or your services as a timber surgeon. Have you got anything else in your lexicon?
Joy of joy every since the events of the death of Osama Bin Laden the buzz word is conspiracy.I cannot believe itits everywhere,on the talk radio LBC and BBC today people are ringing in and talking about conspiracy. I have been over the last two years studying the subject and it is amazing how things are gradually unfolding.For the new truthists get into my favourite David Icke and for a taster Freeman Fly or look up Freemans Perspective and the whole world will different! Lastly I recommend for another angle a bit of fun Alex Jones enjoy!
Some say that Saddam was not executed the other year, but one of his Iraqie official lookalike stand ins. My mate said a mate of his saw the actual Saddam shopping in a Tescos Extra the other day, after the, ahem!, pubs shut. An Elvis moment his mate calls it.
I think Trump will be a hit with US voters.