Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
4 May 2011
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
Alastair Campbell’s diary: It’s time for a European army
Keir Starmer wants Britain to get closer to the EU. The war in Ukraine and Trump’s military posturing put European security at the heart of that realignment... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin
How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country? Rory a... Continue12 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?
Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)
What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Maia Sandu, the leader who stood up to Putin
The president of Moldova saw off a vicious campaign from Russia by educating the public about the threat and mobilising them against it. Would we do the same here?... Continue7 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?
Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win? Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue6 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
169. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia vs. Musk, AI, and the Battle for Truth
Who gave us an encyclopedia in our pockets? Why is the statement that Donald Trump is the "worst president in US history" allowed on his Wikipedia page? How do Brazilians and Americans differ on the... Continue5 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
The only surprising feature is that yet again the conspiracy theorists are given all the ammunition they need to raise their game. With such a momentous event forthcoming the Obama administration had months to pre-plan their news management in the aftermath. Yet we have statements that OBL was armed and used a woman as a human shield, now contradicted by the White House themselves.
It would be interesting to hear from AC as to why so little time/thought is devoted to the pre-planning of the aftermath of such events, when the fan has been struck.
I’m no conspiracy theorist, but the official story of what happened in Pakistan is just plain weird, especially the burial at sea.
I think this is what most people find difficult to swallow – even more so in the context of the parading and public execution Saddam (arguably a less significant find) was given.
From what I have been reading online, the conspiracy theories are saying that he was *already* dead (most say in 2002)… not that he isn’t dead.
“Secret memos expose link between oil firms and invasion of Iraq.”
No, this is not from a conspiracy theory website. It is from the Independent. And the memos are government memos.
Tony Blair called the “oil conspiracy theory” absurd. Public denials were issued at the time. But now government memos show that plans to exploit Iraq´s oil reserves were discussed by government ministers and world´s largest oil companies year before Britain took a leading role in invading Iraq.
No wonder there are conspiracy theories around!
And surely the papers should have known better than to print the “official line” from the White House about Osama bin Laden immediately without a question.
And Martti Koskenniemi, a Finnish professor of international law, stated on our TV that the US acted against the rules. Justice and revenge are two different things.
As Jackie Ashley wrote in the Guardian, international law is all we have. If we throw it away, we have nothing left.
Targeting Gaddafi is against international law.
President Ronald Reagan´s Executive Order 12333 says that “no person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in assassination”.
Jimmy Carter´s EO 12036 bans indirect US involvement in assassinations. EO 11905 by Gerald Ford bans political assassinations.
The US has been involved I guess in over 50 military actions after WW2. Before Libya, only Korean War (1950-53) and 1991 Persian Gulf War had the UN backing.
The US did terrible things to civilians at Laos and Vietnam. Its involvement in Vietnam was based on a lie what happened at Tonkin Gulf.
The US government via CIA has been involved in numerous regime changes, many involving democratically elected governments.
Iran 1953. Guatemala 1954. Congo 1960. Chile 1973. Nicaragua. El Salvador. Etc.
The US cannot claim a monopoly on the moral high ground.
And after Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib we cannot trust the US.
George Orwell wrote in a 1946 essay that political language has to consist largely of euphenism and sheer cloudy vagueness. As long as there will not be straight talk from governments, there will be conspiracy theories around.
And for a very good reason.
Jim Hacker´s first rule of politics was: Never believe anything until it is officially denied!
Ps. Personally I do believe only in one specific conspiracy theory. There clearly was a second shooter on the grassy knoll. And yes, I have seen a photo of it unearthed from the US by a reliable Finnish journalist. It was shown on our national TV.
Spot on, as usual. Any chance you could show the return key a little love though? That’s one hell of a block of text to digest in one go 🙂
Would having him alive and tracked not be of greater benefit to our global security, as some reports suggest he was still authorising global attacks. surely the knowledge this provided could have saved countless lives. Or was this simply a tactic to raise Mr Obama’s ratings after a torrid few weeks.
Obama couldn’t have lied the consequences would be too much for any nation to handle. Yet knowing his whereabouts for so long, I think this death is more for a political reason rather than world wide security
The conspiracy theorists will, as you say, believe anything that they want but I’d be happy to bet any of them that we won’t be seeing a still living and breathing Bin Laden popping up on Al Jazeera any time soon. The conspiracists will, presumably, just argue that he’s being held somewhere or other for the rest of eternity. Cognitive dissonance is a wonderful thing.
yew fag
It would help if they released the actual events as they happened, rather then changing the story several times, as if to try and justify it. I suppose it wouldn’t stop the conspiricy theories, but at least the US Gov’t would have had more credibility in what is seen by the majority of people as a pretty well executed mission.
Will we get to see the footage? A Hollywood version is more likely starring Charlie Sheen.
So do you think the OBL op is the reason the Royals changed their plans and didn’t have a honeymoon?
The conspiracy theorists must be completely mad.
Do they believe for a second that Obama would risk gifting OBL with the PR coup of the century…. by simply making it known that he’s still alive??
I think chumps may be offended by your comparison…
he is more chumpy a chump-chump than the biggest chumpiest chump chump that ever chumped a chump in chumpland.
And I just loved that Obama probably didn’t even know until afterwards that his live TV announcement cut off 15 minutes of Chumpy Chump-chump’s, new Chump of the year show.
And we don’t need photos to know Obama is a USURPER, but we got some anyways, have a look!
The video that will END the Obama Presidency! Birthers Get Last Laugh & Demand Formal Apology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1DHZmeMXyE
Conservative Central Office must be livid – complete waste of a Royal Wedding to distract the media from the government’s plans ahead of the local elections.
With hindsight they could have had the wedding next May instead unless……
AC I don’t think there will be many people claiming that Osama Bin Laden is still alive. Quite the opposite in fact. OBL has been announced dead before.
In 2002 in Pakistan by President Musharraf.
In 2003 the Head of the FBI said he was dead.
In 2005 a US Senator said he was dead.
In 2007 Benazir Bhutto said in an interview with David Frost that he had
been killed and even named the assassin.
There can surely be no doubt that OBL is dead. As for when, where and how?
That’s another question. It all depends on evidence and who is to be believed.
I’m not sure whether you’re advertising a particularly toxic brand of cigarette or your services as a timber surgeon. Have you got anything else in your lexicon?
Joy of joy every since the events of the death of Osama Bin Laden the buzz word is conspiracy.I cannot believe itits everywhere,on the talk radio LBC and BBC today people are ringing in and talking about conspiracy. I have been over the last two years studying the subject and it is amazing how things are gradually unfolding.For the new truthists get into my favourite David Icke and for a taster Freeman Fly or look up Freemans Perspective and the whole world will different! Lastly I recommend for another angle a bit of fun Alex Jones enjoy!
Some say that Saddam was not executed the other year, but one of his Iraqie official lookalike stand ins. My mate said a mate of his saw the actual Saddam shopping in a Tescos Extra the other day, after the, ahem!, pubs shut. An Elvis moment his mate calls it.
I think Trump will be a hit with US voters.