Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
16 December 2010
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
161. Putin, Trump, and 500 Years of Resisting Russia (Radek Sikorski)
What was it like for Radek Sikorski to be a refugee in the UK from communist Poland in the 80s? How will the war in Ukraine come to an end? Why is populism on the rise in Europe and how do we... Continue10 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Murdoch’s Succession Battle and the Fight for Fox News
What are the key differences between Murdoch's children, particularly Lachlan and James? How do the internal family conflicts of the Murdochs mirror the TV show Succession? What will Rupert M... Continue7 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
465. Andrew’s Disgrace, Newsnight, and a Centrist Win in the Netherlands (Question Time)
How much transparency should we demand from the monarchy? Do the latest Dutch results show that populism is fracturing, or simply mutating? And, did Xi embarrass Trump? __________ Join Ror... Continue6 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
464. Labour’s Tax Timebomb, Climate Backsliding, and Sudan’s Forgotten War
Is this the Budget that breaks Labour, or can Reeves walk the tightrope? Why does the general public increasingly think we’re overreacting to climate breakdown? Why aren’t Elon Musk’s p... Continue5 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Elon Musk’s role in funding fascism
What Musk calls free speech, I call the promotion of fascism. The Tesla CEO needs to leave our politics alone... Continue5 November 2025
The Monster He Made: Murdoch, Trump, and the Price of Power
What was the nature of the relationship between Fox News and Donald Trump? What, or who, caused Rupert Murdoch's marriage to Wendi Deng to end? What were the consequences of Fox News promotin... Continue3 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
The Monster He Made: Murdoch, Trump, and the Price of Power (Part 4)
What was the nature of the relationship between Fox News and Donald Trump? What, or who, caused Rupert Murdoch's marriage to Wendi Deng to end? What were the consequences of Fox News promotin... Continue3 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
160. Michael Gove: Education, Brexit, and Trump (Part 2)
What is Michael Gove's lasting legacy on education in the UK? Would he have come to his position on Brexit if it weren't for Dominic Cummings? Is Nigel Farage's Reform a better chance for the... Continue3 November 2025
Posted by Alastair Campbell
They are gambling with peoples jobs and gambling with the livelihoods of millions of families and from where im sitting i dont fancy the odds they are offering.
Great post – ‘such’ spelt ‘succh’ on the first line though… 🙂
They will need plan B. And possibly plans C, D, E. ,,,,
But they won’t be alone. Lots of us are in full plan B mode as Tory ideology scuppers our employment. And praying that the said plan B pays off.
We are all in this together after all.
Is it not significant that the first unemployment figures under Tory ‘rule’ show an increase? Their plans gamble that we will be content to lose our full time jobs and accept part time work in Argos – don’t think that’s a plan, it’s a lie and a poor quality lie at that
Trying as hard as I can to stay on topic, The Birmingham Post reports that after protests Tory Solihull Council has come up with plan B for making cuts at its crematorium.
Plan A?
Carry out multiple cremations – i.e. roast two or three bodies at once to save gas.
Now, having lost my dad in May, having had a very private family gathering to scatter his ashes, I can say that we placed quite a lot of faith in our Cremation service next door in Brum.
Much as a devout Christian takes sacrament in the faith that the biscuit and the wine are the body and blood of Christ – not merely a representation – we rather hoped that when we scattered dad’s ashes it stood a good chance of actually being him.
Not Mrs Jones or Mr Smith or a bag of chicken sweepings or some mixture thereof.
The ancients learned that it was a good idea to let people treat their dead with dignity. Some Tories in local government, it seems, do not think so.
Ha ha. This made me smile! Glad to see you illustrious types have Jonah days too! Maybe civil servants not such a bad idea – have always previously balked at such invisible, unaccountable power…..
George Osborne has in his misguided courage boasted that there is no Plan B.
But he should realize that Britain is not yet out of danger zone. The financial crisis is only in its first phase. If we continue with the “centre ground” neoliberalism, there will soon be even bigger crisis.
Neoliberalism is not based on any solid empirical or theoretical foundation. In fact, it is based on double fallacy of self-regulating markets and rational economic actor.
With low interest rates and sovereign debt the central banks and governments will be lacking in means to combat the next crisis.
If we want to save western-style capitalism, there must be a more active role for state in the economy and more regulation. Basel III rules are not enough.
Britain´s economy is now growing because of Labour´s measures. Next year the growth will slow. There will be cuts and rise in VAT to 20%.
Unemployment is now 2.5m. And about 390,000 public sector jobs will be cut. Yet George Osborne believes that private sector will be able to create 2.5m new jobs!
Cabinet secretary´s Plan B is more than welcome. My guess is that Mr Osborne will need a new round of quantitative easing from BoE. He will also be forced to make changes to his reckless cuts.
Pro-active industrial policy is needed to rebalance Britain´s economy after the Tories destroyed much of the traditional manufacturing in the 1980s.
The coalition has conned a lot of people into believing that Labour caused the deficit by overspending on public services. As I showed yesterday, this is not the case.
Britain is not Greece – never has been. There is no economic rationale for huge cuts. They will, in all probability, only increase the deficit.
What is needed is a strategy for growth and jobs. Stamped money could be a good idea. A recovery loan could be used to infrastructure projects.
The coalition´s cuts are ideological because David Cameron has admitted that they will not be reversed when the books have been balanced.
Ralph Miliband said that state can never tame capitalism. Tony Crosland believed that this could be done.
Labour must come up with a new economic model based on state activism and more regulation of the financial sector.
If the coalition does not abandon neoliberalism and change its economic policy, only the God that I do will be able to help Britain.
This is worth a watch…
http://falseeconomy.org.uk/blog/video-a-brilliant-demolition-of-osbornes-austerity-economics
And Brown didn’t take a huge gamble with the economy? And lost?
Oh no, forgot, it was the bankers wot did it.
…and who is taking a gamble with higher education? Perhaps you don’t feel that you have the right or inclination to comment..