Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
24 February 2009
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
489. Musk’s AI Deepfake Disgrace & JD Vance’s Minnesota Lies (Question Time)
Will the UK ban 'X' over explicit, nonconsensual deepfake images of women and children generated using its AI tool? What does JD Vance's outburst against the Minnesota ICE shooting victim tell us abou... Continue15 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: It’s time for a European army
Keir Starmer wants Britain to get closer to the EU. The war in Ukraine and Trump’s military posturing put European security at the heart of that realignment... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin
How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country? Rory a... Continue12 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?
Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)
What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Maia Sandu, the leader who stood up to Putin
The president of Moldova saw off a vicious campaign from Russia by educating the public about the threat and mobilising them against it. Would we do the same here?... Continue7 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?
Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win? Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue6 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Andrew Rawnsley wrote a very good article in the Observer called Do the Tories know what they would do with power. In it he says that Conservatives lack proper programme. They just flirt with latest intellectual fashion and then drop it (like politics of nudge).
Exactly right, AC. Am curious as to how Gordon and the Government’s ratings compare to incumbent parties across democracies affected by the global downturn. Would also be very surprised if any – bar the most ardent Tories – would favour the policy vacuum that is G Osborne over Darling and Brown when it comes to responding to the crisis. Though a staunch Labour supporter since able to vote, one of my largest criticisms in the past has been the party’s timidity in government. Not so now. Am genuinely awed by Brown’s performance in the past six months; a courageous pragmatism we always suspected he had. These polls can be corrosive to both confidence and conviction. Labour must stand firm and united. Importantly – as it seems to be doing at present – the Government must form policy in response to economic reality not the journalists’ imaginations nor the electorate’s nervous caprices. We have a year of tough economic management ahead. Let the results of that be what we are judged on at the ballot box, not our weekly tally in the pollsters’ popularity contests.
Andrew Rawnsley wrote a very good article in The Observer called Do the Tories know what they would do with power? In it he says Conservatives lack a proper programme. They just flirt with the latest intellectual fashion and then drop it (like politics of nudge).
Absolutely! If you look at how far the Tories were behind in the mid-1990s we’re doing pretty average for a government at this stage in a normal 4-5 year period, let alone 12 years into a Government! And still they can’t create anything of a lead (and in many polls remain behind) on economic competence.
Because the Tory party has been in the wilderness for so long it has failed to attract serious commitment politicians. Consequently the party is populated by ‘hobbyists’ and ‘wealthy opportunists’ who seek self-gratification through power.
The Tory party is not even unappealing medicine – it is an unappealing placebo.
Simple, really: there are a lot of incredibly tribal people in the UK. Any rational person surveying the wreckage of the economy and the deranged ramblings of the monocular mentalist would be reaching for the piano wire and scaffolding. However, a staggeringly large number of the electorate would, quite literally, vote for a turd with a red rosette on it.
Well, they would if the turd would hold an election.
Some practical comments on your blog, Alastair:
1. Have you heard of this new-fangled thing called “paragraphs”?
2. Your website is “pretty” to look at, but “pretty awful” in the usability area. It is hard to navigate and hard to link to posts.
Still, at least the content is more interesting than Dolly Draper’s Dementia. Just please have a look into those paragraph thingies.
Toodle-pip!
Think that you might be over-reading the significance of a dip in Tory support. A 2% reduction in a sample size as small as this could easily be statistical error.
Following on from Obnoxio’s comments that you also haven’t published, as well as the Labour tribe in this country voting for a turd, so long as it wears a red rosette, Labour has bought half the electorate with state funding stolen from the rest of us.
If I was a 40 year old Tax Credits claimant adjudicator in Middlesbrough, earning £40,000 a year with a gold-plated pension at 50 when I plan to retire in ten years “due to stress”, then I would keep voting Labour too.
I would estimate that my salary by then would be about £60,000 and I would get 90% of this for the rest of my life, index-linked, and paid for by the as-yet-unborn children of the tax payer class.
All I have to do is time-serve for another ten years, wait for my last big promotion to “Senior Tax Credits Claimant Adjudicator”, and then flake out at my desk the next day due to the “pressure”.
If the Tories get in and sack me, after abolishing tax credits and replacing them with a general all-round tax cut, this strategy is screwed.
I’ll have to get a proper job in a town with a 70%+ majority of the ‘workforce’, running on the government’s drudgy wage bill.
Because I speak an incomprehensible lingo which even people in Sunderland find difficult to understand, I’m stuck here, plus I’m a bit thick. And if the government jobs get cut, then I’m really buggered. Who on Earth would employ me? What use would I be to anyone? I can avoid answering the phone, avoid reading filled-in forms, and run my eBay business 2 hours a day from my desk, run my Middlesbrough FC fanzine for an hour a day at my desk, start at ten, finish at 4, take 2 hour lunch breaks, Fridays and Mondays off every second week “on the sick”, and get free bacon butties every morning in the staff canteen, plus six weeks holiday every year. But what use am I otherwise?
So I’ll keep voting Labour until the end of the next major Ice Age – even though I know they’re a bunch of lying, thieving, stealing, jobsworth, [expletive deleted]s. I especially know they’re useless because I work for them, so every day I see their wasteful policies in action (eg. employing me to run a private eBay business when a private company would kick me out on my derriere).
That’s where the 28% is coming from. It won’t drop much lower, if at all, except perhaps to switch to the BNP.
Democracy is a God that has failed.
Those paragraph breaks were a whole innovation, btw.
Where the Tories are in the polls at the moment is largely academic; what matters is the state of the parties at election time. What is clear is that Mr “Five initiatives a day before breakfast” continues to turn of the floating voter with his insistence that none of the mess he has created is anything to do with him. Meanwhile Labour MPs continue to trough at our expense; who was it who said his party would be “whiter than white”?
I suggest the motto of the Labour campaign be ABC (Anyone But Cameron). It’s likely to catch on…although Labour is running more on what they stand FOR rather than what they stand AGAINST.
3rd of March will be a test of the water in Norwich. Even those despairing of Labour are not automatically jumping to Cameron – they can’t envisage that he would handle the global effects any better!
If you don’t trust the polls, perhaps you should get Gordon Brown to call an election?
Most of the newspapers are now turning/have turned against Labour. Because most newspapers like to side with the majority of their readership, not a particular party.
I honestly think the time for left right politics is now almost completely irrelevant.
Have you see this poltiical compass?
http://www.politicalcompass.org/index
It is very interesting. I am a very extreme Left Libertarian which means I will never get anywhere in politics as all modern politics is Right Authoritarian. Very interesting to see the US Presidential election candidates’ political positions on the compass.
Do you suppose the Dalai Lama really took that test?
I think there is a single question that you can ask people in order to determine what sort of a person they are and where they stand politically: What do you value most, justice or mercy?
By the way the Tories can’t be home and dry, until an election is not only called, but declared, in their favour. I thought you were a pedant?