What the hell is going on at the BBC? Another great institution being harmed by Brexit
What the hell is going on at the BBC? Another great institution being harmed by Brexit
Post
9 February 2018
Posted by Alastair Campbell
4
Yesterday the Daily Telegraph led on a 'story', part penned by Theresa May's former right-hand man Nick Timothy, that billionaire George Soros was at the heart of a 'secret plot' to reverse the EU referendum.
Anyone who follows politics even vaguely is aware that Mr Soros is a supporter of the UK staying in the EU, and a backer of the Best for Britain campaign, one of the myriad groups resisting Brexit. It is not a secret. It is not even a plot, given what they do and say is all out there. But it is of course all of a piece with the view among newspapers that all that matters is impact, and getting talked about on telly, radio and social media (if you can get a bit of a thing going about anti-Semitism, even better); and all of a piece with the fact that the hard right newspapers no longer make any effort to separate news and comment, but operate more as propaganda mouthpieces for whichever tax exiles happen to owe them.
So that the Telegraph led on such a 'story', pleasing to their Channel Island owners, is not really a surprise. What is shocking, however, is how the BBC, the moment the paper dropped, allowed its own agenda to be driven by this 'story.' The morning news bulletins could have come from the same pen that wrote the Telegraph 'story.' On and on it churned through the day ...
Meanwhile, to give you a few snapshots of other news on the Brexit front ...
A delegation of Japanese political and business leaders delivered a blunt message, privately to Theresa May, publicly to the media outside Number 10, that Japanese investors would withdraw from the UK if we lost free access to EU markets (just as we Project Fear People had said they would when we were being defeated by Project Lies in the worst campaign of recent times.)
The ministers tasked since June 2016 with agreeing a Cabinet Brexit strategy met once more to agree the Cabinet Brexit strategy, and agreed that they still couldn't agree on one, and therefore decided that they would need to defer the strategy agreement until a Chequers away day some time down the track.
It emerged that far from Brexit cutting down red tape, there will be plenty more, not least that UK car and lorry drivers heading to the Continent may need new licenses and registration certificates.
A UK government negotiating paper revealed that our 'Brexit means Brexit' Prime Minister will in fact be asking other governments to consider us still be part of the EU, even after we have left, so that we can still be covered by hundreds of international treaties.
An EU negotiating paper revealed 'Brussels,' as 27 independent sovereign states are now called by the BBC and the Brextremists, believes Northern Ireland must stay in the single market even after Brexit as the only way of avoiding the hard border the UK, Ireland and the EU as a whole insist must not return.
Any one of those stories is what I would call significant, interesting, newsworthy. They barely figured across the BBC outlets this morning. Eventually Ireland's European affairs minister Helen McEntee was interviewed on the Today programme (showing that Ireland has deputy ministers way better and more articulate than our top ranking ones), but I would like you to consider what prominence would have been given by the BBC to the following stories, had they been available.
- Japanese business leaders today told Theresa May they were looking forward to doing a post-Brexit trade deal, and guaranteed to maintain investment in the UK. 'That's a lead,' shouts Humphrys.
- Ministers today set out the agreement they have reached over their strategy for Phase 2 of the Brexit talks. 'Oh, I think that should be the lead,' argues Nick Robinson.
- The government has assured British lorry drivers there will be no change in their ability to drive across Europe after the UK leaves the EU. 'That's the lead,' says Sarah Sands. 'Much more focused on people not process.'
- Theresa May has insisted the UK will still be covered by hundreds of international treaties despite leaving the EU. 'Let's make that the 810 slot.'
- EU leaders have said they are confident the UK can leave the single market without the need for the return of a hard border between the North and the Republic of Ireland. 'Get Laura lined up for a two-way.'
I think we can safely say they would have been higher up the news agenda, not spiked as most of the real Brexit stories were yesterday.
The BBC has always had a problem in allowing the loudest newspapers to set its agenda. We see it in the review of the papers too. The Mail, the Telegraph and the Sun almost always dominate. When the Mirror gets a mention, it is 'Labour-supporting,' the Guardian is 'left-leaning.' Why no such labels for the hard right papers, Mr and Mrs Beeb policy directors?
And this is, I can tell from experience, a policy. They have decided that Brexit means Brexit, and the coverage must reflect that. Hence - see the letter from editor Matt Kelly to director general Tony Hall yesterday - the New European has had literally zero mentions on BBC paper reviews since its birth in the wake of the referendum. Sky and commercial radio take a totally different approach.
We see something similar in the way that every discussion or panel programme has to have a Brextremist voice. Just has Nigel Farage has appeared on Question Time more than anyone apart from David Dimbleby, so today it would seem no Brexit package can be prepared without Jacob Rees-Mogg being on it, and if not him, one of the Brextremists he is able to co-ordinate at public expense through the so-called European Reform Group.
They are entitled to exploit whatever media opportunities present themselves. But the BBC is not entitled to make it so easy for them. The sad truth is that their fear of government over the license fee and their over compensation for attacks on them as 'the liberal metropolitan elite' by the right-wing press has hard wired Brextremism into their news gathering and reporting DNA.
They should not for one moment think that their pandering to these people will help them in the long run. It won't. The hard right now pushing their hard right Brexit have the BBC in their sights every bit as much as the NHS that 'Doctor' Liam Fox and Co want to hand over to his American friends.
The BBC comforts itself by saying as they get attacked from all sides, they must be just about getting it right. Nonsense. They get attacked by the Brextremists because the right has always known, back to the Tebbit era, that bullying and intimidation works. They are getting attacked from the other side of the argument because it is so blindingly obvious they are not covering the most important issue of our time in a balanced and serious way fitting of the - till now - greatest brand in world broadcasting.
4 responses to “What the hell is going on at the BBC? Another great institution being harmed by Brexit”
You’re absolutely right. Great post. The only problem, and it is a weakness that undermines so many anti-Brexit voices, is that no-one’s record in government is entirely transparent when it comes the BBC. After all, the organisation has shown similar pro-govt bias in the past. Moreover, I seem to recall that some severe wounds to the brain stem of this generation of BBC News may well have been inflicted by the very administration you represented.
Trump today is accused of militarist narcissism when he demands a parade, but one could argue that the fetishization and near canonisation of the military by generations of previous administrations has cleared the path for Trump’s personal excesses. Similarly in the UK, the embarrassingly poor performance of the BBC today is the result of decades of hollowing out the organisation in the face of demands for conformity by different administrations, which have left it in the parlous state we find it today.
I wish I knew what the cure was, but I would enjoy to see you chair a frank and open discussion between the DG’s of the BBC from Birt via Dyke to Davie and for once be offered some transparency over the workings of that most opaque of “news” organizations
Join the club, the BBC have been acting like this in Scotland since 2012. This week, Scottish MPs and MSPs were given a letter telling them they has a few hours to have alook at the brexit impact statemrnts, in a closed off room, chaperoned by officials with no ability to relay any information to anyone else and under a number of other conditions. The BBC basically never covered this news.
The BBC are driving an agenda soley aimed at attacking the Scotgov while protecting the Tories. They doorstep Nicholas Sturgeon but refuse to do the same for Ruth Davidson or Dacid Mundell. Remember David Mundell has quesrions to answer for telling parliament that there were no sector analysis for Scotland which was a lie. Ruth Davidson continues to avoid the media until it suits her. She phoned up the radio to tell them about her going on the Great British Bake Off “celeb” special. Priorities.
The BBC ignore their duty to provide fair and balance coverage of events. They fail in their duty to cover events.
Whether you fall on the right or left of politics, you should be shocked and concerned that oir apparent impartial broadcaster is taking sides and offering propaganda and acting as government mouthpiece instead of giving the democratically balanced service we pay for.
Unfortunately Mr Campbell, you, rightly or wrongly, will for ever be associated with the type of news-manipulation that you now accuse the BBC of. Blair, Brown, Mandelson and you were the reason I stopped supporting the Labour Party after forty years, No good crying “it wisna me”. If you really want to observe propaganda at work you should pay attention to BBC Scotland, particularly the so-called news programmes. It shames Scotland, the UK and journalism in it’s “Pravda” like output. Since about 2010 the amount of people in Scotland who express satisfaction with the BBC has plummeted and I imagine the licence fee figures have too. In their desperate attempt to stop people in Scotland resuming their rightful independence the BBC has abandoned, the much-trumpeted, but false “British values” trope of “fairness”. The UK is dying, but it, and the BBC cling on to the remnants of Empire in a desperate but failing bid to remain relevant. Unfortunately the UK I once believed in has abandoned all sense and it’s dream for the future consists of a longing again for an Empire that brought untold misery around the world. Really sad!
Has the scale of Donald J. Trump’s corruption become too big to prosecute? Is the US Constitution now a roadmap to tyranny instead of a protection against it? Why do 72% of Gen Z think things will o...
Continue
Why does Trump understand the media better than the media understands him? Are tech billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos more dangerous to journalism than Rupert Murdoch ever was? What did Tina ...
Continue
Why has there been such an increase in young people diagnosed with mental health problems? Are Gen Z less resilient than older generations, or have they been seriously let down? Has therapy culture go...
Continue
Are Xi and Putin playing Trump? How serious is the new Ebola outbreak, especially after Trump's and Britain's severe cuts to international aid? With Tommy Robinson explicitly telling his supporters to...
Continue
By re-igniting the Brexit debate, is Wes Streeting deliberately trying to sabotage Andy Burnham's chances in a Leave-voting area, or is he forcing Labour to finally confront reality? Does Hungary's ne...
Continue
Will Rahm Emanuel run to be the next President of the United States? What were the underlying policy disagreements regarding West Bank settlements that led to Benjamin Netanyahu publicly attacking Rah...
Continue
You’re absolutely right. Great post. The only problem, and it is a weakness that undermines so many anti-Brexit voices, is that no-one’s record in government is entirely transparent when it comes the BBC. After all, the organisation has shown similar pro-govt bias in the past. Moreover, I seem to recall that some severe wounds to the brain stem of this generation of BBC News may well have been inflicted by the very administration you represented.
Trump today is accused of militarist narcissism when he demands a parade, but one could argue that the fetishization and near canonisation of the military by generations of previous administrations has cleared the path for Trump’s personal excesses. Similarly in the UK, the embarrassingly poor performance of the BBC today is the result of decades of hollowing out the organisation in the face of demands for conformity by different administrations, which have left it in the parlous state we find it today.
I wish I knew what the cure was, but I would enjoy to see you chair a frank and open discussion between the DG’s of the BBC from Birt via Dyke to Davie and for once be offered some transparency over the workings of that most opaque of “news” organizations
Totally agree!
Join the club, the BBC have been acting like this in Scotland since 2012. This week, Scottish MPs and MSPs were given a letter telling them they has a few hours to have alook at the brexit impact statemrnts, in a closed off room, chaperoned by officials with no ability to relay any information to anyone else and under a number of other conditions. The BBC basically never covered this news.
The BBC are driving an agenda soley aimed at attacking the Scotgov while protecting the Tories. They doorstep Nicholas Sturgeon but refuse to do the same for Ruth Davidson or Dacid Mundell. Remember David Mundell has quesrions to answer for telling parliament that there were no sector analysis for Scotland which was a lie. Ruth Davidson continues to avoid the media until it suits her. She phoned up the radio to tell them about her going on the Great British Bake Off “celeb” special. Priorities.
The BBC ignore their duty to provide fair and balance coverage of events. They fail in their duty to cover events.
Whether you fall on the right or left of politics, you should be shocked and concerned that oir apparent impartial broadcaster is taking sides and offering propaganda and acting as government mouthpiece instead of giving the democratically balanced service we pay for.
Unfortunately Mr Campbell, you, rightly or wrongly, will for ever be associated with the type of news-manipulation that you now accuse the BBC of. Blair, Brown, Mandelson and you were the reason I stopped supporting the Labour Party after forty years, No good crying “it wisna me”. If you really want to observe propaganda at work you should pay attention to BBC Scotland, particularly the so-called news programmes. It shames Scotland, the UK and journalism in it’s “Pravda” like output. Since about 2010 the amount of people in Scotland who express satisfaction with the BBC has plummeted and I imagine the licence fee figures have too. In their desperate attempt to stop people in Scotland resuming their rightful independence the BBC has abandoned, the much-trumpeted, but false “British values” trope of “fairness”. The UK is dying, but it, and the BBC cling on to the remnants of Empire in a desperate but failing bid to remain relevant. Unfortunately the UK I once believed in has abandoned all sense and it’s dream for the future consists of a longing again for an Empire that brought untold misery around the world. Really sad!