Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
8 December 2011
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
178. Gavin Newsom: The Next President Of The United States?
What happened on a ridiculous midnight phone call between Donald Trump and the Governor of California? Why does Gavin Newsom believe the President will be crushed in the mid-terms? What is Newsom’s ... Continue2 March 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
507. The Ayatollah Is Killed – REACTION
With the confirmation of the death of Iran's Supreme Leader confirmed, where does this leave the regime? Who is being targeted in Iran's retaliation attacks and how have Iranians reacted? Is Trump's b... Continue1 March 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
506. Trump Attacks Iran: What Happens Now?
As Tehran launches retaliatory strikes against Israel and US military bases, how dangerous is this moment for the Middle East and the wider world? Are the attacks an attempt by Trump to shift attentio... Continue28 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
505. Are Trump and Putin Underestimating Ukraine?
On the fourth anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, what's the reality on the ground? Why is Trump still calling the shots on negotiations with Russia, given the huge withdrawal of U... Continue25 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: I’m in Ukraine, a nation let down by America
But on the fourth anniversary of the war, Ukrainians want more than just warm words. They want real help to end this war. Trump isn’t going to give it – so it’s down to us... Continue24 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
504. Is Trump Losing His Tariffs War? (Question Time)
Will Trump escalate his global acts of aggression in response to the dramatic Supreme Court ruling? How will the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor change the course of British royal history? Will L... Continue24 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Trump’s Ukraine delusion
After four years of war, Putin isn't winning. So why does the president insist he is?... Continue23 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
23 February 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Cameron needs to find out what his MPs really think, at the moment they’re hidebound by what they’ve said to their constituents to get their votes and are now held ransom to whenever there’s a division.
Some are playing a similar game to Cameron’s (with his varying scripts according to whom he’s facing at the time).
Surely it’s possible for Govt Tories to have a blind/anonymous vote on the topic of whether the EU is best for us at a national/international level or not.
That’s what should concern them, not being blackmailed by what might please their own voters. He’s got to face up to having bought the votes of some that would have
gone for the BNP or UKIP if either had had enough candidates for a Govt. We hear so much about Labour being beholden to the unions, less about those beholden to racists and tax cheats.
Alastair, I admire your cheek!
‘Authenticity is the key to modern comms’ implies that spin is no longer in and we all need a good bout of honesty from our politicians. It’ll never happen as you and your colleagues have been and still are media manipulators, we’re getting kidded every day of the week by the complicit mainstream media.
The good thing is that we now have the internet and we can convey our views in a wider and more open forum.
If this makes our politicians more likely to be honest then great but
I won’t be holding my breathe.
‘As for David Cameron, honesty and authenticity require him to work out what he really thinks…’
But does he really think anything beyond ‘How do I and my chums stay in power?’
Nice thought Alastair but we have long lost political leaders that tell the truth -‘or even recognise what the truth is. Sadly nor do they understand that we would respect them far more if they did.
They come across as impotent, and as I have said before, they are looking after their own behinds, not to do a faux pas which would affect their future political career. They just seem to come out with the same feckless not taking responsibilty bollocks all the time. Bring back Winnie I say, he is the sort of character that is needed, calling a horse a horse, or a spade a spade, and etc. comparison wotsits.
Christmas pantomime season starts.
Thanks to leaks we know what the plans of European globalists are. They want a federal superstate, but cannot say it directly.
Anyway, citizens do not like it.
So we are treated with these silly summits one after another. Play-acting!
Banking elite, which also wants a United States of Europe, has provided politicians the platform to move towards the superstate by producing economic crisis which is bound to become much worse.
There is easy solution to the eurozone “crisis”. End austerity and reform the banking sector.
But, of course, this will not do for the neoliberals and freemasons.
(One of the aims of freemasonry is a world government as anyone can see from the writings of H.G. Wells.)
So we are now heading for a Credit crunch 2.0.
Global banking system faces insolvency. Maastricht Treaty prevents European Central Bank (ECB) from saving banks.
Politicians do not want market forces to be involved when it comes to banks. Taxpayers must guarantee the losses.
Bank bailouts caused the “mess”. Growth is needed to balance the books, but the same banks which caused the mess are now demanding austerity and “reforms”.
Austerity is destroying investment and jobs. Tax receipts will go down, and benefits costs up.
So the government deficits will rise. It is now probable that Mr Osborne will face almost the same level of deficit in 2015 than it was in 2010. All because of lack of economic growth.
The EU currency must serve the public, not big corporations. Private financial interests must now come second.
The plan of the globalists is to demolish democracy, personal freedom and capitalism. Depression is the tool to achieve this. Austerity leads to recession and depression.
Nation states will be a thing of the past. Soviet-style central planning is on the menu as tax and spending plans will be transferred to Brussels.
So we have to witness this EU charade until the globalist bankers and freemasons in politics will finally get what they – and not the public – want.
Ps. The US credit-ratings agency Standard & Poor´s is a division of McGraw-Hill. Rothschilds control McGraw-Hill through Vanguard (4.46%) and State Street (4.14%). According to a Swiss study by the University of Zurich 147 cross-owned Rothschild-controlled companies control 40% of the wealth of global economy.
I now know what it feels for a country to be led by a former PR consultant, they lie habitually and deceit becomes an objective of state policy. The tragedy, however, is that they drag many along with them under the belief that all is fair in politics including barefaced lies. Gone are the days of Sir John Major who at least showed some decency.
These Cameron lot now actually claim that Gordon Brown wanted to lead Britain into the Euro! Can Cameron for once not allow his penchant for lies to at least concede that Gordon Brown and by extension Balls did more than anyone to preserve the pound?
I think Cameron will say anything – he is such a lightweight. But I am extremely concerned that we seem to have no bargaining power whatsoever, primarily because leaders in the EU know the UK government doesn’t believe in Europe. They can see Cameron coming.
Re a question of yesterday about agencies like S&P – who are they?
Have just heard a report that Germany’s recently revised number of As or +/*s means that their loans are now costing double to insure.
What on earth that can mean for poorer countries or what it means in terms of commission or another word beginning with ‘com’ but ending in ‘icity’, the mind boggles.
Alistair! You say you don’t do god, but surely the One sits on the shoulder of Tony Blair. Otherwise HE would be president of the EU right now.
Hilarious.
Sometimes you can catch them at it (telling the truth) if they forget to switch their mikes off George:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15635476
Standard and Poors are a city funded credit rating organisation Michele. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_%26_Poor’s
Their objectivity and credibility is often questioned, sometimes rightly sometimes wrongly.
Thanks RH but my first line was quoting the question of yesterday, it’s one that more media commentators than AC have placed, questioning the sudden prominence of S&P (especially since they are actually so long-lived and so very Republican).
As to their need just to be, to exist, given that we already (supposedly) have the IMF assessing countries’ budgetary performances, I see them as just another set of vultures.
My point was about their apparent effect on insurance policies to cover countries’ loans and if Germany are now paying double what they used to on theirs, what the he** effect to S&P have regarding poorer countries?
We have more than the banks to worry about under the heading of ‘bar stewards’ imhoo.
Hope the gormless threats from trolls that you posted about a couple of weeks ago have come to nothing 🙂