Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
1 December 2010
2 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
205. Anthony Scaramucci: Why America Keeps Making the Same Mistakes
Why does Anthony Scaramucci think Osama bin Laden is “winning”, and what has the War on Terror really cost America? From letting China into the WTO to bailing out the banks in 2008, how did Americ... Continue7 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Becoming Burnham: The Manchester Arena Call, Westminster Plotting, and Keir vs Andy
To hear the full episode, and the whole series, sign up at therestispolitics.com How did Andy Burnham learn about the Manchester Arena bombing? Would he still have tried to become PM had Keir Starmer... Continue3 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
568. MAGA’s Plan to Make Britain Look Broken and Iceland’s ‘Brexit’ Moment
Did Iceland's rejection of EU membership talks repeat the same mistakes as Britain's Remain campaign, and does it hand a dangerous propaganda win to Farage, Putin, and the wider anti-European right? A... Continue3 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
567. Who Really Benefits from AI and Will Data Centres Decide the Midterms?
Why is the backlash against data centres becoming one of the most combustible issues in US politics? What does an AI system's attempt to cheat, cover its tracks, and break into another company’s web... Continue2 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
2 September 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
204. Will a Wealth Tax Actually Fix Britain? (Dan Neidle)
Why does tax expert Dan Neidle take Gabriel Zucman seriously as a thinker on inequality, but dismiss Gary Stevenson's warnings as populism? What did he uncover in Peter Mandelson's emails, and how did... Continue31 August 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Becoming Burnham: People Pleasing, The Shadow Years and Losing to Jeremy Corbyn
Who are the political figures that shaped Andy Burnham? How far will the new PM go to be liked? And what impact did losing to Jeremy Corbyn's popularity 'tsunami' have on his career - and confidence? ... Continue27 August 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
566. Carney vs. Trump and Alastair’s Advice for Burnham’s First PMQs
Why is Mark Carney choosing economic pain over a deal on tariffs with Trump? As Palestinians prepare to vote for the first time in 20 years, why has Mahmoud Abbas decided that now is finally the momen... Continue27 August 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Schools in NI are still largely segregated by religion, one of the main problems remaining.
Your pal’s disasterous obsession with faith schools in the UK is a legacy we cannot criticise as your PC brigade will not permit questioning of the many religious bigots who run them.
Witness the hold the RC Church had over it’s flock which allowed systematic child abuse in faith schools.
But Labour still doesn’t allow its members to stand for election in Northern Ireland. How normal is that?
I don’t believe that the thirty-plus years of Troubles were an inevitability. British troops were briefly deployed in Northern Ireland by Harold Wilson’s Labour Government during disturbances around Easter 1969. They were deployed on a longer term basis from August 1969 during ‘The Battle of the Bogside’. However in both instances the troops gave some protection to the Catholic minority, which was under attack from Orange thugs. The disturbances had been triggered off by students from Queen’s University marching for Civil Rights. The IRA was at this stage pretty moribund. After the Conservative Election victory of June 1970 the role of British troops changed drastically. The Conservatives were, after all, the Conservative and Unionist Party. Troops now started working with the Orange Order and the Protestant-dominated police force by attacking the Catholic minority. The IRA consequently had new life pumped into it. Internment in 1971 and the utter stupidity of sending the Paras into the Bogside in January 1972 acted as a recruitment drive for the IRA. From then on the Troubles were secure until a subsequent Labour Government managed to pursue a serious and effective peace process – unlike John Major’s effort, which was more hindrance than help. Sorry to be partisan but I blame the Troubles on the unbelievable blockheadedness of Ted Heath’s government and the military elite that supported it. Thatcher compounded all previous mistakes to a degree to which only someone as narrow-minded,bigoted and one-sided as she was (and is) could be capable. Let’s hope it’s all behind us for good.
Things are not perfect in Northern Ireland (as in the rest of the world) but let’s be grareful they are so much better than they were and hopeful they will further improve (as in the rest of the world).
It’s good to see the economy here is improving at the moment—-thanks in large part to Alister Darling.
Total bollocks as usual from you. Maybe the ruling classes at your fancy function think you and TB have left things normal, take it from me you have not. Next time you are over take a walk outside the five star penthouse you are in and see what is really happening. Economy wrecked, disaffected youth, unemployment and rising terrorism, and its only started. What you and Tony have done is put the people of NI back at the mercy of the most evil terrorists in Europe. Chat to the real people on the ground or police and below Chief Insp rank they will put you straight.
I agree with your comments marymot, things in Northern Ireland have obviously improved from the days when the troubles dominated the news. Thanks in the main to Tony Blair and that nice, mild-mannered American man, whose name escapes me at the momment, George something I think it was.
When money began to be invested in a big way it was a sure sign that things would not be allowed to return to the bad old days. Let’s all hope that continues to be the case.
I just knew those nasty Conservatives were at the bottom of all the Irish troubles.
Thanks Chris but you’d be a lot more persuasive if you backed up some of your comments, on this issue and on other issues other people have made on this blog. For instance I’ve made an assertion that the role of British troops in Northern Ireland changed drastically after the June 1970 General Election. I’ve also made an unprovable assertion (since we can’t replay history) that the thirty-plus years of Troubles in Northern Ireland did not have to happen and would not have happened but for their coincidence with twenty three and a half years of Conservative government. If you’re saying that neither assertions stand up to scrutiny then why don’t you bolster your counter-assertion with a few facts?
I attended one of Alastair’s talks recently and didn’t notice a high representation in the audience from the ruling classes. I did notice a lot of Andrew Marr’s blogger stereotypes making comments in the tone of ‘reality1960’.
I’d be interested to know what you mean by ‘normal’ in relation to Northern Ireland. Do you mean the well-entrenched sectarian state that resulted in peaceful civil rights activists being ambushed by armed thugs at places like Burntollet in late 1968?
Can you tell me a time since 1968 when the words ‘economy wrecked’, ‘diasaffected youth’ and ‘unemployment’ have not been applicable to Northern Ireland? As for ‘rising terrorism’ let’s just hope you’re wrong – I’m pretty sure ‘the real people on the ground’ and ‘the police’ ‘below Chief Insp rank’ have had enough, but with what is effectively an old-fashioned Tory government back in office I’m not confident on the basis of previous history.
Said it yourself Dave “unprovable assertion”.
I did indeed say it myself so I wouldn’t have thought I needed telling. I’m still waiting patiently for you to say something at all. But on the subject of ‘unprovable assertions’ I’ll give you another one on a different subject which perhaps you feel more inclined to accept. In the 1980s Margaret Thatcher used to counter the arguments for nuclear disarmament by saying that Cruise Missiles, Trident and other weapons of mass destruction had maintained the peace in Europe for forty years. That was an unprovable assertion – we can’t replay history to find out whether there would have been peace or not in Europe during that forty year period if there had been no nuclear deterrents. Unfortunately, and despite her undergraduate experience in chemistry, Margaret Thatcher was more of a religious fundamentalist than a scientist. But be honest Chris – does her unprovable assertion bother you as much as mine?