Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
10 February 2010
3 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
557. Can Burnham Really Deliver Britain’s Biggest Change in Forty Years?
Can Andy Burnham, in a single term or less, fix problems like social care that are generations in the making? Is his new push for vocational education a long-overdue fix for Britain's broken skills sy... Continue29 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: The right wing case for climate crisis denial is going up in flames
Europe is burning, food insecurity is growing and Trump and Farage are still shouting about “Net Stupid Zero”... Continue28 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
27 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Britain’s Ticking Time Bomb: The Food Security Crisis
Could the UK be facing empty supermarket shelves by 2030? Are food distribution centres sitting ducks for drone warfare? And how has Britain got to a place where is has just 3 days to 3 weeks worth of... Continue23 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
556. The US-China AI Arms Race and Badenoch vs. Rory’s Centrism
Is China quietly outsmarting the US in the AI arms race, and is Trump laying the pitch to challenge the results of the US midterms with his repeated, unfounded claims of Chinese election meddling? Why... Continue23 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Posted by Alastair Campbell
555. Burnham’s Cabinet Purge and Rough Sleeping Pledge: Will He Succeed?
What does Andy Burnham’s purge of Starmer loyalists from the top of government tell us about how the new British prime minister will govern the UK? Why did Ed Miliband drop his ten-year Energy Secur... Continue21 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
198. How Trump’s Imperial Presidency Really Works
How does the most chaotic White House in history actually make decisions? How did Netanyahu sell Trump on a regime change war in Iran? Who is the only world leader Trump is truly afraid of? Alastair... Continue20 July 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Blimey! Is this really all Labour has got? Couple of jibes at an individual? Dog-whistling “Chateau Cameron” epithet.
Whatever happened to the “moral compass”, the “end to boom and bust”, the “end to child poverty”, “education, education, eductation”? At least those were policies, if overpromised and under-delivered policies.
New Labour has nothing to show for its 13 years in office. That is why its campaign for re-election seems to consist entirely of personal insults.
Chretien was in so many ways not an obvious politician – looked and sounded a bit odd. But he was a terrific tactician and his wit could be deadly. The S Day story had me remembering all that. Good luck
Hope you’re right it is becoming an issue. I live in one of Ashcroft’s marginals and the weight of Tory materials is impressive. People need to know where it is all coming from and how evasive the Tories are about him and his money. Can’t help thinking that if this was a Labour peer, doing something similar, he would be as well as known as Simon Cowell or Becks by now
I’m admittedly a bit behind here.
If we’re talking about Lord Ashcroft, can Labour also clarify the non dom or tax status of Lord Paul please?
Jonathan, this is a blog not a political manifesto. Lighten up. This sounds a great idea. The Tories deserve to be skewered over Ashton. In the Ealing and Shepherds Bush marginal the leaflets he is paying for are being distributed by an agency which uses illegal immigrants to do the work. More Tory hypocracy there.
Mine was signature number 29 🙂
AC – Arrogant Campbell….to call the Tories arrogant is the best case of “pot calling the kettle black” I’ve ever heard…with the prospect of a sterling crisis and round 2 of the Credit Crunch – all you can bleat on about so arrogantly is a guys tax status..does anybody care in the scheme of things….jobs lost,debt mountain,a change in direction for politics…and any prospect of 5yrs more years of GB,these are what matter.
Mine was signature 388 to still a long way to go. Oh yes we must keep Cameron’s background to the fore and how can anyone say that the last 12 years have not seen improvments. Just look at the infrastructure improvements in schools and hospitals. Look at the higher staffing levels in all the main services. On a seriouse point – how can we convince people that crime has reduced if no-one believes the figures?
It was Rick Mercer of the political satire show “This Hour Has 22 Minutes” who started the Stockwell/Day petition”
from wiki:
“2000-01 – Often cited as the show’s best joke, the sketch was aired during the 2000 federal election campaign, and consisted of a staged rant by Rick Mercer.
When former Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day ran for Prime Minister of Canada, he proposed a mechanism to call for a referendum. A petition on any particular subject which gathered at least 350,000 signatures of voting age citizens (“3% of the electors”) would automatically trigger a national referendum.
Mercer’s “rant” asked viewers to log on to the 22 Minutes website, and sign an online petition asking the party leader to change his name to Doris Day (after the singer/actress). Producers claim to have obtained in excess of 1,200,000 online votes. This was cheerfully admitted to be a stunt unhampered by the rigours of an Elections Canada-controlled petition. Although the skit had no effect on Alliance policy, it did obtain international publicity for the show and contributed to the general air of farce surrounding Day’s election campaign. Day did, however, have a very appropriate response to the petition: “Que será, será.”[3]”
Although the entire thing is risible, populist politics can have devastating consequences. Many decades ago, similar referenda in the prairies provinces lead to the sterilisation of children who were deemed mentally-challenged and who later went on to successfully complete secondary education.
We need real political leaders, not Cameron-like cheerleaders. Transforming politicians into administrators of referenda and simple executors of the people’s every whim is not the solution.
Last year the local tories were pleading poverty stating all their funds were raised locally. Recently we’ve had 3 direct mails, glossy brochure, glossy leaflet and a normal leaflet. Worse than this we’ve had to endure staring at Cameron’s airbrushed mug on two poster sites. Not bad for a local party with little money…..unless a few quid has been doanted from afar, after all we are a marginal.
On Lord Ashcroft’s Tory donations – if we assume he should be paying 50% tax and his donations to the Tories are from untaxed income it means half of the leaflets they send out in the marginals are being paid for by the rest of us taxpayers.
What a swizz!!