Europe needs to get real on defence; Britain needs to get real on Europe
13 February 2025
Post
11 May 2011
5 minute(s) read
Recent Posts
Alastair Campbell’s diary: It’s time for a European army
Keir Starmer wants Britain to get closer to the EU. The war in Ukraine and Trump’s military posturing put European security at the heart of that realignment... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
488. Is Iran on the Edge of Revolution?
Could the Iran protests finally break the Supreme Leader’s brutal reign, or will the regime's deadly crackdown contain the unrest? If the US intervenes militarily, what would a Trump-style plan for ... Continue13 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
170. President of Moldova, Maia Sandu: Holding the Line Between Democracy and Putin
How did Maia Sandu fight Russian disinformation in Moldova? What is it like to have a war in the country next door? Will the European Union accept Moldova with Russian troops in the country? Rory a... Continue12 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
China Vs USA: Who Will Win the AI Race?
Who really controls AI; governments, corporations, or no one at all? Is AI becoming a new kind of global arms race? And, can we keep humans in charge of systems that move faster than we do? Rory and ... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
487. Is Starmer Rethinking His Approach to Europe? (Question Time)
What do Keir Starmer’s comments on 'closer alignment' with the EU single market actually mean? After the Bondi terror attack, how can a centrist government respond to national trauma without fuellin... Continue8 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
Alastair Campbell’s diary: Maia Sandu, the leader who stood up to Putin
The president of Moldova saw off a vicious campaign from Russia by educating the public about the threat and mobilising them against it. Would we do the same here?... Continue7 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
486. Does Maduro’s Capture Put Greenland at Risk?
Is Venezuela the start of something bigger? If this isn’t regime change, what does Trump actually want? And, has Trump just handed Putin a win? Join Rory and Alastair as they answer all these ques... Continue6 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
169. Jimmy Wales: Wikipedia vs. Musk, AI, and the Battle for Truth
Who gave us an encyclopedia in our pockets? Why is the statement that Donald Trump is the "worst president in US history" allowed on his Wikipedia page? How do Brazilians and Americans differ on the... Continue5 January 2026
Posted by Alastair Campbell
By strange coincidence I am currently listening to James Hacker on BBC Radio 4 Extra.
Questions have recently been asked about the leadership qualities of Ed Miliband – including by commenters on this website.
Some people yearn for his brother David. Surely he would have been a better choice?
New Labour lost 5m voters during its time in government. But only 1m went to the Tories.
Ed Miliband is best placed to win back the voters who deserted to the Lib Dems. Ed Miliband is also best placed to win back C2 working class supporters who have stopped voting for Labour.
Ed Miliband is best placed to win the next election.
Precondition for many former Labour voters to return back has been an apology for the Iraq war and “economic mess”. Ed Miliband has done this. David Miliband would never have done so.
During the Labour leadership contest it became clear that Ed Balls´s second preferences would decide the winner. Ed Miliband immediately asked Mr Balls to put a word for him.
David Miliband never asked. Some might call this integrity, some arrogance. What became clear was that you cannot win a leadership contest on this kind of attitude – never mind general election.
And there is no longer such a thing as trade union bloc vote – ordinary people voted for Ed Miliband.
Ed Miliband is playing the long game. He has a plan. He will be of the right age when the general election comes.
Ed Miliband is right to target the squeezed middle. After the cuts people in the South will also vote for Labour.
People yearning for return of Blairism with its emphasis on aspiration should realise that New Labour believed in neoliberalism which almost broke the world´s financial system.
Ps. The BoE has now lowered the growth forecasts for 2011 and 2012. As for Nick Clegg´s speech, it was lies, lies and more lies once again. Labour was committed to deficit reduction, and had a credible plan by Alistair Darling to halve the deficit in four years without risking the recovery. And Britain´s debt in 2009-10 was only 53.5% of GDP, so there was no “economic emergency” then. The bond markets were not panicking, and there were not forcing cuts on the scale of £81bn. It was a political choice. A wrong one! No wonder that according to ComRes survey 63% do not trust Mr Clegg.
Calm down Alastair, for gawds sake. Hyper or what? Anyway, crikkers is my sport, always has been. although footie was as well. when my joints were young.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wweh3ROiqWI
I remember well the Old Trafford Test, I had the pleasure and joy of watching Willis terrify them. Good old Kim Hughes walked out to bat as if he really didn’t want to be there!
I’m not getting the same sport that I enjoyed with Mr Rentoul so I think I may need another blog to patronise.
I look forward to being demonised for telling the truth but the truth I will tell and it may get pretty uncomfortable for Mr Campbell (nurse get me a super injunction).
Let battle commence!
Lancashire Lad
“Ed Miliband is best placed to win the next election” You must be joking!
There is nothing statesmanlike about EM. He’s a disaster for the Labour Party. To be honest the only person on the Labour front bench who looks remotely like a leader or a future PM is Ed Balls (imho). But I get the impression that EB being so closely connected to GB in the recent past has not made him overly popular with the general public.
However, if EB became leader sooner rather than later, then he may just be in with a chance of getting across the message to the electorate that (a) The debt/deficit was not Labour’s fault. (It was the bankers) and (b) A Labour Government would not be making the mistakes that this Tory Led Government are making now by cutting too far and too fast and therefore putting pay to any hope of a swift recovery.
Labour need to sort themselves out PDQ or we will be in for 10 years or more of the “same old Torries” and who accept for the very wealthy needs or wants that?